Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> But I wonder how this squares with the SQL spec...
> The root of this problem is that revoking privileges from the owner
> doesn't square with the SQL spec in the first place. Allowing having a
> grant option without the privilege
Tom Lane writes:
> So an owner can never revoke his own grant options? That seems
> reasonable offhand, and compatible with our previous notion that
> the owner's ability to GRANT was inherent and nonrevocable.
>
> But I wonder how this squares with the SQL spec...
The root of this problem is th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL) writes:
> When revoking privileges from the owner, don't revoke the grant options,
> to avoid recursively revoking everything from everyone.
So an owner can never revoke his own grant options? That seems
reasonable offhand, and compati
