On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> Well... Coming back to the subject, are there any recommendations from
>> committers? -std=c89 in CFLAGS does not seem to help much to detect
>> extra commas in enums, even if this has been added in C99.
>
> My opinion
Michael Paquier writes:
> Well... Coming back to the subject, are there any recommendations from
> committers? -std=c89 in CFLAGS does not seem to help much to detect
> extra commas in enums, even if this has been added in C99.
My opinion is don't worry about it. The buildfarm will find such pro
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 10/24/16 8:37 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Well... Coming back to the subject, are there any recommendations from
>> committers? -std=c89 in CFLAGS does not seem to help much to detect
>> extra commas in enums, even if this has been ad
On 10/24/16 8:37 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Well... Coming back to the subject, are there any recommendations from
> committers? -std=c89 in CFLAGS does not seem to help much to detect
> extra commas in enums, even if this has been added in C99.
The only option that gives you a warning for this
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO writes:
>>> An alternative that would be worth considering is to adopt a uniform
>>> rule of // for line-ending comments and /* for all other uses.
>
>> Why not. As far as comments are concerned, editors usually highlight them
>> in
Fabien COELHO writes:
>> An alternative that would be worth considering is to adopt a uniform
>> rule of // for line-ending comments and /* for all other uses.
> Why not. As far as comments are concerned, editors usually highlight them
> in some color, and my eyes get used to the comment color,
I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
I think some c99 features would be nice (variadic macros for one), but
those particular two get a big "meh" from me.
This is probably a matter of
On 24/10/16 21:11, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>>> Fabien COELHO wrote:
I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
>>
>>> I
I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
I think some c99 features would be nice (variadic macros for one), but
those particular two get a big "meh" from me.
Yeah. Personally, I'd want
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:03:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >> I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
> >> declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
>
> > I think some c99 features w
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >> I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
> >> declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
>
> > I think some c99 features would be nice (varia
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
>> declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
> I think some c99 features would be nice (variadic macros for one), but
> those particular two get
Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I find it annoying that "//" comments are not supported, or having to
> declare variables at the beginning of a block instead of when first used...
I think some c99 features would be nice (variadic macros for one), but
those particular two get a big "meh" from me.
.oO( I w
C99-specific feature, and wasn't intentional in the first place.
Per buildfarm member mylodon
This is the second time I see that in the last couple of weeks. Would
it be better to use some custom CFLAGS to detect that earlier in the
review process? I have never much used gcc's std or clang ex
(Moved to -hackers)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Remove extra comma at end of enum list
>
> C99-specific feature, and wasn't intentional in the first place.
>
> Per buildfarm member mylodon
This is the second time I see that in the last couple of weeks. Would
it be
15 matches
Mail list logo
