On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:45:34 -0300 2011:
>
>> Looking back at Thom's original example, it seems odd to allow this
>> syntax at all:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE a (
>> num integer,
>> CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:45:34 -0300 2011:
> Looking back at Thom's original example, it seems odd to allow this
> syntax at all:
>
> CREATE TABLE a (
>num integer,
>CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num < 20)) NOT VALID
> );
>
> It's not documented, but is currently
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:16:29 -0300 2011:
> There is a similar problem with NOT VALID check constraints on
> domains. These are still being dumped as part of the CREATE DOMAIN
> statement, which is invalid syntax, so they need to be dumped
> separately from the domai
On 25 November 2011 16:16, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
>>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
>>> >
>>> > On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom B
On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
>> >
>> > On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> > > The dump correctly contains:
>>
On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
>> >
>> > On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> > > The dump correctly contains:
>>
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
> >
> > On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> > > The dump correctly contains:
> > >
> > > CREATE TABLE a (
> > > num integer,
> > >
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
>
> On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown wrote:
> > The dump correctly contains:
> >
> > CREATE TABLE a (
> > num integer,
> > CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num < 20)) NOT VALID
> > );
>
> Actually I mean incorrectly contai
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 02:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
>>
>>> > Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
>>> > tracking without much additional burden on c
On 18 July 2011 02:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
>
>> > Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
>> > tracking without much additional burden on committers.
>>
>> I mean, there's git notes, but that
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
> > Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
> > tracking without much additional burden on committers.
>
> I mean, there's git notes, but that's not exactly what we're looking
> for here, and I
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> My understanding of git notes is that they can be added after a commit
> without changing the commit - indeed that's apparently a large part of their
> raison d'être:
>
> A typical use of notes is to supplement a commit message without
>
On 07/17/2011 08:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
We do need a way to track this information.
+1 on everything Josh said.
Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy tracking
without much additional burden on committers.
I mean, there's git notes, but that's not exactl
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
venue for the other credit.
>>>
>>> I'm open t
On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
>>> messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
>>> venue for the other credit.
>>
>> I'm open to ideas.
>
> I think the commit log isn't actually usefu
On 07/12/2011 06:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
;-)
Create a macro ;)
Can we add
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
>
> > > Agreed. ??On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > Can we add text if the emp
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
> > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > ;-)
> >
> > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:34, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> >> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
>> >> mentioned to me (in
On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
I don't see that as much better. Commit messages should not be ads, IMHO.
There are plenty of ways to give credit without polluting the commit log with
it.
...Robert
--
Sent via
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
> >> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
> >> didn't t
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
>> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
>> didn't think that mentioning sponsors
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 20:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
>> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
>> didn't think that mentioning sponsors f
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
> didn't think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good
> idea.
>
> I don't think w
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some
> time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay.
> Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it;
> moreover, it provides a
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he didn't
> think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good idea.
>
> I don't think we have
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of jue jun 30 11:58:09 -0400 2011:
> Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
>
> [...]
>
> This patch was sponsored by Enova Financial.
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apol
27 matches
Mail list logo
