Bradley Baetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. OK, I poked through the code a bit more, and I think I now realise
> why we were talking across each other. I've attached a 'patch' which
> gets the mergejoin counts down to something reasonable.
I've just committed a significant set of changes in t
[Moving -> -hackers]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:00:08AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bradley Baetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, its much faster (although not as fast as sticking the DISTINCT
> > in there myself), but the actual rows coming from the sort is really odd
> > - where is that n
