On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> > 2009/1/10 Tom Lane :
>> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> >>> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
>> >>
>> >> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
>> >
>> > I thing, so this is bug - RETURN Q
Robert Haas wrote:
> > 2009/1/10 Tom Lane :
> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
> >>> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
> >>
> >> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
> >
> > I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
> > RETURN NEXT pattern.
> >
2009/1/10 Heikki Linnakangas :
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't
>> solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave.
>
> Me? I don't recall doing anything related to this.
>
I have to look to archive, maybe Peter.
Pavel
> --
Pavel Stehule wrote:
My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't
solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave.
Me? I don't recall doing anything related to this.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers m
> 2009/1/10 Tom Lane :
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>>> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
>>
>> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
>
> I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
> RETURN NEXT pattern.
>
> My first patch expected so RETURN
Hello
2009/1/10 Tom Lane :
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
>
> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
>
>regards, tom lane
>
I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
RETURN NEXT patt
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.post
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am sending patch, that adds FOUND and GET DIAGNOSTICS support for
> RETURN QUERY statement
>
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule
>
>
>
> 2008/11/10 Andrew Gierth :
> >>
I am sending patch, that adds FOUND and GET DIAGNOSTICS support for
RETURN QUERY statement
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2008/11/10 Andrew Gierth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> "Pavel" == "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Well, changing the semantics of an already-released statement
> >
