On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto
wrote:
> One thing that concerns me is the first EXPLAIN plan from regress_rls_dave:
> +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM part_document WHERE f_leak(dtitle);
> + QUERY PLAN
> +---
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Thanks Mike. I'll take a close look to verify output correctnes, but I
>> am concerned that the new tests are unnecessarily complex. Any other
>> opinions on that?
>
> Some tests would be
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 02:44 PM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM,
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and
committed i
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and
>> committed in the next day or two.
>
> That would be great. Thanks.
I have the updated patch with rowsecurity regressi
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and
> committed in the next day or two.
That would be great. Thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgs
