On 02/29/2012 02:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2011-05-08 at 19:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the "make check" target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that
On sön, 2011-05-08 at 19:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe that the "make check" target in src/test/isolation is
> fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
> member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
> pg_isolation_regress program depends on
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> What's a bit annoying is that these tests were checked in without a
> vestige of MSVC support, and nobody pinged the usual suspects (i.e.
> Magnus and me) to ask for help in providing it,
Speaking of pinging Windows people, have either of you noticed the
reports that CR
On 05/08/2011 09:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/08/2011 07:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the "make check" target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
pg_iso
On 05/08/2011 07:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe that the "make check" target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
pg_isolation_regress program depends on libpq, and in p
Greg Stark writes:
> How is this different from the regular case with pg_regress?
pg_regress doesn't link in libpq.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/ma
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> While we could maybe hack this to the point where it works (on some
> platforms) by dynamically linking libpq from the source tree, I don't
> think it's worth the trouble.
>
How is this different from the regular case with pg_regress?
--
greg
I believe that the "make check" target in src/test/isolation is
fundamentally unportable, as is illustrated by the fact that buildfarm
member coypu is currently choking on it. The reason is that the
pg_isolation_regress program depends on libpq, and in particular it
depends on having an *installed
