Re: [HACKERS] "make check" and pg_hba.conf

2016-10-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 10/18/16 6:31 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > I would want to do that so that the code dealing with password-based > logins doesn't go completely untested by "make check", like it currently is. Write a TAP test for it. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Developmen

Re: [HACKERS] "make check" and pg_hba.conf

2016-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Janes writes: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> No. Why would you want that? External connections to the test DB seem >> like exactly what you *don't* want, for reproducibility's sake. > I would want to do that so that the code dealing with password-based logins > does

Re: [HACKERS] "make check" and pg_hba.conf

2016-10-18 Thread Jeff Janes
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Janes writes: > > Is there a way to get "make check" to install a custom pg_hba.conf for > its > > temporary installation? Something like pre-prending the line: > > local all password_user md5 > > To the default pg_hba.conf? > > No. Why

Re: [HACKERS] "make check" and pg_hba.conf

2016-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Janes writes: > Is there a way to get "make check" to install a custom pg_hba.conf for its > temporary installation? Something like pre-prending the line: > local all password_user md5 > To the default pg_hba.conf? No. Why would you want that? External connections to the test DB seem li

[HACKERS] "make check" and pg_hba.conf

2016-10-18 Thread Jeff Janes
Is there a way to get "make check" to install a custom pg_hba.conf for its temporary installation? Something like pre-prending the line: local all password_user md5 To the default pg_hba.conf? Thanks, Jeff