Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, I suppose this "kluge" in gram.y for "substr_list" isn't necessary any
> more?
It's still necessary, because if you write
select substring('1234' for '3');
you should get "123", but what you will get without the cast is "3"
because the pref
Hm, I suppose this "kluge" in gram.y for "substr_list" isn't necessary any
more? Don't really see a downside to leaving it, just thought I would mention
it since I noticed the comment is outdated.
| a_expr substr_for
{
/*
* Since there are no cases where this syntax a
