On Wednesday 17 January 2001 02:53, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> > I don't think they're moving the actual Slashdot site to PostgreSQL...
>
> So do I.
>
> > I think other sites based on Slashcode wanted to be able to use
> > PostgreSQL though...
>
> That's what I will do as
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> I don't think they're moving the actual Slashdot site to PostgreSQL...
So do I.
> I think other sites based on Slashcode wanted to be able to use PostgreSQL
> though...
That's what I will do as soon as possible, and I am trying to be
involved as much as possible in the
> I don't think they're moving the actual Slashdot site to PostgreSQL... They
> paid a bunch of money to the mySQL folks to add replication support to
> mySQL...
>
> I think other sites based on Slashcode wanted to be able to use PostgreSQL
> though...
You are probably correct, but I never expec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:54:37 -0500 (EST)
> To: PostgreSQL-general <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL
>
> I see on Slashdot that:
>
> Slashcode 2.0 ("Bende
