Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing

2008-09-08 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 13:39 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > The point I was making is that for 8.4, unless you specifically > configure with --disable-integer-datetimes, it is enabled by default on > any platform that can support it. We committed that change on 30 March > here: http://archi

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing

2008-09-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Hasn't integer-datetimes been the default for a while? Of course, a catversion bump will force a dump/reload regardless of that. Unfortunately not. It is the default on some versions of linux such as Debian/Ubuntu. The point I was making

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing

2008-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 11:01 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Hasn't integer-datetimes been the default for a while? > No. I added it as a macro to 8.3, but did not enable it by default, > because I am trying to be binary compatible w

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing

2008-09-07 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Hasn't integer-datetimes been the default for a while? Of course, a catversion bump will force a dump/reload regardless of that. Unfortunately not. It is the default on some versions of linux such as Debian/Ubuntu. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Sent via pgsql-hac

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing

2008-09-07 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hello, On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 11:01 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Hasn't integer-datetimes been the default for a while? No. I added it as a macro to 8.3, but did not enable it by default, because I am trying to be binary compatible with Red Hat / Fedora RPMs. I believe Tom will also add it to