Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:42:56AM -0400, Sandeep Chadha wrote: > I'd say yes replication can solve lot of issues, but is there a way > to do replication in postgres(active-active or active-passive) Yes. Check out the rserv code in contrib/, the (?) dbmirror code in contrib/, or contact PostgreSQ

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-09 Thread Sandeep Chadha
pgsql-general Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote: > > > "Sandeep Chadha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgre

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote: > > > "Sandeep Chadha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres > > > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other > > > place. Please let me know h

Rép. : Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-08 Thread Erwan DUROSELLE
What I understood from the Administrator's guide is: - Yes, PostgreSQL provides hot backup: it's the pg_dump utility. It'h hot because users can still be connected and work whil pg_dump is running ( though they will be slowed down). ( See Administrator's guide ch9) - No, PostgreSQL does NO

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-07 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote: > "Sandeep Chadha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres > > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other > > place. Please let me know how is hot backup procedure implemented