Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-07 Thread Jason Tishler
This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been resolved: On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., > > > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y > > > successfully. I will

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Tishler
Peter, On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Dave Page writes: > > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the > > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to > > be listed as supported if no-one disagrees... > > I disagree

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Dave Page writes: > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary > distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as > supported if no-one disagrees... I disagree. We document as supported those platforms that build out of the box, not those that