Re: [CORE] [HACKERS] Automating our version-stamping a bit better

2008-06-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am Monday, 9. June 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > >> So while tagging the upcoming releases, I got annoyed once again about > >> what a tedious, error-prone bit of donkeywork it is. > > > Could you explain what the problem is? Your scri

Re: [CORE] [HACKERS] Automating our version-stamping a bit better

2008-06-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> What I was thinking was just to have the script >> print out something like >> >> Tagged tree as 8.3.4 >> Don't forget to run autoconf 2.59 before committing > I like that one ... I've checked in a script to do this --- executin

Re: [CORE] [HACKERS] Automating our version-stamping a bit better

2008-06-08 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, June 08, 2008 21:27:03 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> I'm tempted to suggest letting the script invoke autoconf, too, >>> but that would require standardiz