[HACKERS] unsubscribe

2006-08-03 Thread Wade Klaver
unsubscribe -- Wade Klaver Wavefire Technologies Corporation GPG Public Key at http://archeron.wavefire.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e

Re: [HACKERS] Initdb segfaults during "initializing pg_authid"

2006-06-20 Thread Wade Klaver
Looks like the distclean may have done it. I thought I had already, but who knows. Thanks. -Wade On Tuesday 20 June 2006 09:51, Tom Lane wrote: > Wade Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Initdb seems to barf on me during the pg_authid bit. Below are the > > specifics. P

[HACKERS] Initdb segfaults during "initializing pg_authid"

2006-06-20 Thread Wade Klaver
() #4 0x081981ad in PortalRun () #5 0x08194306 in exec_simple_query () #6 0x08196394 in PostgresMain () #7 0x0813c908 in main () -- Wade Klaver Wavefire Technologies Corporation GPG Public Key at http://archeron.wavefire.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X

[HACKERS] Make failed in HEAD with make -j

2004-02-06 Thread Wade Klaver
at weekend, eh? -Wade Klaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# uname -a FreeBSD ..com 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #22: Mon Feb 2 13:54:43 PST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION-5.0-SMP i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# gmake --version GNU Make 3.80 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable.

2003-09-25 Thread Wade Klaver
future back-port if that ever comes to pass. -Wade > I've committed the attached patch into CVS HEAD. I am now wondering > whether to back-patch it to the 7.3 branch or not. It's a bit larger > than I would have liked, and really needs more testing before being > shove

Re: [HACKERS] invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable.

2003-09-24 Thread Wade Klaver
nction "c_delete_categories" line 14 at SQL statement dropsites=> Is this the same message using the new error reporting framework? -Wade On September 23, 2003 09:44 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > Wade Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stumbled across an odd problem while c

[HACKERS] invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable.

2003-09-23 Thread Wade Klaver
logging is cranked up. If anyone can suggest a method to track down the cause of the following dialog with the db, I would greatly appreciate it. If you need any more info, please just ask. Thank you in advance. -Wade

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-05 Thread wade
Confirmed. Looks like a 100-fold increase. Thanx guys. Explain output can be seen here: http://arch.wavefire.com/pgregex.txt -Wade Klaver At 09:59 AM 2/5/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Ok. The original complain can be sasily solved at l

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-04 Thread wade
attached: no process init caps. word || row_id etc... There are only about 1000 words that appear more than once (2 or 3 times) in 27k rows. -Wade Klaver At 11:08 PM 2/3/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Next question: may I guess that you weren't using MULTIBYTE in 7.2? > >After stil

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-03 Thread wade
one of them will find it. :) I guess in the end, it comes down to the rest of you developer types, but I would be inclined to re-wrap. However, this is easy for me to say given that I have no idea how much work it actually is to re-wrap. -Wade Klaver At 08:07 PM 2/3/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-03 Thread wade
At 05:51 PM 2/3/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Here is the profile information. I included a log of the session that >> generated it at the top of the gprof output. If there is any other info I >> can help you with, please let me know.

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-03 Thread wade
At 10:52 PM 1/31/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> We recently upgraded a project from 7.2 to 7.3.1 to make use of some of >> the cool new features in 7.3. The installed version is CVS stable from >> yesterday. However, we noticed a maj

Re: [HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-02-03 Thread wade
y links that document the procedure for obtaining the profile information you requested? I've used a profiler briefly, but am not sure how to go about gathering information pertainent to this problematic query only. -Wade Klaver. ---(end of broadcast)

[HACKERS] POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2

2003-01-31 Thread wade
, please let me know. -Wade Klaver ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

[HACKERS] invalid tid errors.

2002-12-12 Thread wade
sue, but the fact that it is exhibited on two boxen makes that seem unlikely. FYI: Machine 1: PIII 600 w/ 256MB FreeBSD 4.6 STABLE Machine 2: Dual PIII 600 w/ 512MB FreeBSD 4.7 STABLE Thanx in advance. -Wade Klaver ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] Query performance. 7.2.3 Vs. 7.3

2002-11-29 Thread wade
ose involved in the query. As far as locale suport et al, I can tell you that both are built using a straigh, out-of-the-box ./configure. > >Well, it'd be nice to do better --- I was hoping Wade would look into >why the row estimates were off so much. I'd love to :). Bu

[HACKERS] Query performance. 7.2.3 Vs. 7.3

2002-11-28 Thread wade
% of the time 7.3 does. Explain output can be found at http://arch.wavefire.com/72v73a.txt Please don't hesitate to drop me a line if you require more info. -Wade Klaver ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [

[HACKERS] (libpq) PQclear on questionable result pointer.

2002-08-30 Thread wade
able to do is something like this: if ( result_is_valid( res ) ) { PQclear( res ); } Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions. -Wade ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with

Re: [GENERAL] No postgres on Solaris

2000-12-13 Thread Wade D. Oberpriller
I found it in the PostgreSQL Administrator manual under "Managing Kernel Resources". Wade Oberpriller > > Hi, > I have been using Postgres-7.0.2 on Solaris 8 for the past few months, and > was about to upgrade to 7.1-test, and after following carefully the docs, I >

[HACKERS] PL/Perl on Solaris

2000-11-22 Thread Wade D. Oberpriller
ences about this scenario, your help would be greatly appreciated. Wade Oberpriller StorageTek [EMAIL PROTECTED]