> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>> symlinks.
>> >
>> >> To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
>> >> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.sh
> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
symlinks.
>
>> To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
>> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
>> I think Win2000 or XP woul
>
>> I do not intend to undertake raw disk tablespaces for 7.5. I'd be
>> interested if anyone could provide some real world benchmarking of file
>> system vs. raw disk. Postgres benefits a lot from kernel file system
>> cache
>> at the moment.
>
> Yes, and don't forget that pg also relys on the OS
When compiling the 2004-02-27 snapshot with "make -j 2", the compile of
libpq fails with the following error.
dlltool --export-all --output-def pq.def fe-auth.o fe-connect.o fe-exec.o
fe-misc.o fe-print.o fe-lobj.o fe-protocol2.o fe-protocol3.o pqexpbuffer.o
pqsignal.o fe-secure.o dllist.o md5.o i
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>> Red Hat's still shipping 2.5.4a according to a quick look...
>
> Well Red Hat's still ship Postgres 7.3.4 ...
>
> I'm not considering anymore RH to be up to date with various versions
> :-(
>
> Gaetano
>
>
Not to jump immediately to RH's defense, but Fedora Core 2 (current
