On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Guillaume Smet wrote:
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:58:58 +0100
From: Guillaume Smet
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Andrew Dunstan ,
PostgreSQL-development , o...@pyrenet.fr
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] small parallel restore optimization
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Can y
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:02:35 -0500
From: Andrew Dunstan
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore -m failing
o...@pyrenet.fr wrote:
hi all,
After Andrew corrected the bug I found on pg_restore (-C -m misbehavi
hi all,
After Andrew corrected the bug I found on pg_restore (-C -m misbehaving
one with the other), I played again yesterday.
before the end of restore, I get this :
pg_restore: launching item 4202 INDEX idx_typeper_actif
pg_restore: [custom archiver] could not close archive file: Argument
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:58:18 -0500
From: Andrew Dunstan
To: Tom Lane
Cc: o...@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m
Tom Lane wrote:
o...@pyrenet.fr writes:
pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
gives
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:05:32 -0500
From: Tom Lane
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m
o...@pyrenet.fr writes:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
You sure you don't get exactly the same without
hi,
i've been testing new -m option of pg_restore with great pleasure.
first, let me thank the developpers, it cut restoring time by half.
is it normal that -m doesn't cope well with -C?
createdb db
pg_restore -m 4 -d db db.dmp
works like a charm while
pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
gi
Tom,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:17:18 -0500
From: Tom Lane
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas ,
Zdenek Kotala ,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
o...@pyrenet.fr writes:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Heikk
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:00:31 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on uni
Dear Tom,
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:24:21 -0500
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:23:06 -0500
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:15:28 -0500
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on un
Dear all,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:17:52 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb han
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:19:15 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:29:01 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:47:19 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:22:25 +0100
From: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Could you generate a core and send a stacktrace?
kill SIGABRT should do
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:22:25 +0100
From: Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Could you generate a core and send a stacktrace?
kill SIGABRT should do
Hi all,
cvs head configured without --enable-debug hang in initdb while making
check.
warthog doesn't exhibit it because it's configured with debug.
when it hangs, postmaster takes 100% cpu doing nothing. initdb waits for
it while creating template db.
According to truss, the last usefull
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:23:47 +0200
> From: Guillaume Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: pgsql-hackers list , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS build takes far longer than before
>
> Hi all,
>
> While working on our network problems to s
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:36:24 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing
>
> I wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:37:51 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > As you can see here:
> > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-b
As you can see here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=jaguar&br=HEAD
Jaguar has been failing for two days while centaur is ok.
The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Is that related?
Thought you should know.
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT
Hi All,
Is it me or none of the mirror names can be resolved?
ftp.fr.postgresql.org host unknown
ftp.fr4.postgresql.org host unknown
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:22:13 -0500
> From: Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sun to buy mysql
>
> On Jan 19, 2008 10:01 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm surprised no
Hi all,
I'm surprised no one mentioned here that Sun was ready to buy Mysql for $1
billion.
Could it change something for postresql? if yes, what?
Best regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AU
Hi Gregory
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:34:57 +
> From: Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: convert int to bytea
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > select 124::bytea doesn't work
> >
> >
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a trigger that converts integer to bytea.
My schema is like this:
Create table xx (
id int,
...
data bytea);
the first 3 bytes of data are the binary representation of id
(id is extracted from data by the application)
I can occur that id change in that case da
From: Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cd /home/ohp/build-farm && ./run_build.pl
--verbose
[05:00:02] checking out source ...
[05:01:00] checking if build run needed ...
[05:01:04] copying source to pgsql.10004 ...
[05
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:45:30 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Jaguar is a new animal meant to test specific defines as aske
Jaguar is a new animal meant to test specific defines as asked by Tom
sometime ago.
Right now, it compiles and runs with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Let me know if you want me to add/change flags
Best regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges
Dear Tom,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:05:58 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worr
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:07:23 +
> From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I wo
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:53:10 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> H
Hi Tom
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:47:04 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> I wrote:
> > Hmm, this is messier than I thought. What evidently has happ
Dear Tom,
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:21:20 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Is
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:42:24 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I'm confused,
Sorry to post on my own post,
I found this (as a little exemple I've got plenty of these)
could that be the culprit and how to correct that?
--
-- Name: RI_ConstraintTrigger_609094000; Type: TRIGGER; Schema: public; Owner:
delain
--
CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER ""
AFTER DELETE ON objets
FRO
Hi Tom et all!
Thanks for your mails.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:08:24 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> [EMAI
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:11:14 +
> From: Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm now testing 8.3beta2 on a relatively
Hi hackers,
I'm now testing 8.3beta2 on a relatively big (10G) database.
I've tried with pg_dymp -Fc/pg_restore and pg_dump/pgsql and get those
errors:
ERROR: trigger "" for relation "objets" already exists
ERROR: trigger "" for relation "perso_objets" already exists
ERROR: trigger "" for rela
Hi Tom and Andrew,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in
> D
Hi Tom
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in
> DefineIndex():
Hi all,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:34:46 -0400
> From: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
> Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was
> continuing to access the
>
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > An
Hi Andrew
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:30:43 -0400
> From: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend memory growing too much
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I don't know m
Hi everyone,
I've been using sqlgrey for some time now and I'm very surprised by the
memory taken by the backends to which sqlgrey is connected.
look at process 4111 and 28108 . They roughly take twice the space the
other backend take.
Could there be a memory leak?
I don't know much about DBI/D
Hi Simon,
I'll be glad to test it for you when you're ready!
Thanks for looking at this issue.
Best regards,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:55:32 +0100
> From: Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [H
Hi Simon,
Sorry for replying so late...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:16:35 +0100
> From: Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] little PITR annoyance
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:10:06 +0100
> From: Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] little PITR annoyance
>
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'
Hi all,
I've benn biten twice by this one:
I enabled archiving on both my pgsql servers.
the archive command was a simple gzip on an nfs mounted dir.
Now the nfs server crashed.
Both wal space filled up until postgresql shuts itself down because of no
more space for WAL.
That perfectly normal and
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:50:56 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] misread release notes
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> > I read the &
ea where do I put the E in the insert query?
Keep the good job!
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
But wait...
it works fine as of HEAD today...
Sorry for the noise, will try to --enable-xml on warthog soon.
In the mean time,
Merry Xmas to all
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:05:21 +0100 (CET)
> From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Tom,
It still pass with --enable-debug only,
So it seems an optimizer problem.
What's next?
Best regards
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:31:21 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:36:04 -0600 (CST)
> From: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libxml on unixware
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > ohp@pyrenet.fr writes
gards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyren
Hi Albe,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:31:35 +0100
> From: Albe Laurenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
>
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:20:44 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Albe Laurenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
> "Al
Hi Albe,
Thanks for your remarks
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:54:13 +0100
> From: Albe Laurenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware a
t;-lldap $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS"
fi
else
AC_CHECK_LIB(wldap32, ldap_bind, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([library 'wldap32' is
required for LDAP])])
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:26:14 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
PROTECTED]>
> To: Albe Laurenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
> "Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shouldn't that be
> > AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:42:50 +0100
> From: Albe Laurenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
> Olivier PRENANT wrote:
an <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
>
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The right way to do this I think is to put an entry adjusting LIBS in
> > src/makefiles/Makefile.un
Thanks for replying,
You are right but I have no knowedge on howto popagate this to
Makefile.unixware.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:03:04 -0500
> From: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers l
llber -lresolv"
fi
else
When I have time, I intend to update the SCO FAQ if someone can tell me
what should be in...
Many thanks for the great release!!!
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
3119
Removing
#include $(top_srcdir)/contrib/contrib-global.mk
in sslinfo Makefile makes the problem go away...
Hope it helps
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:49:21 +0200
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-
PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Hi Tom,
It now works like a charm!
Many thanks.
Best regards,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:00:37 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Warthog failing
>
)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:42:24 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pltcl -- solved
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> > Just a note that pltc
61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream,
"__PLTcl_proc_38907_trigger_38898 pkey1_before 38898 {{} key1 key2 txt}
BEFORE ROW DELETE {} {key1 1 key2 {key1-2 } txt {test key
..."
NOTICE: updated 1 entries in T_dta2 for new key in T_pkey2
NOTICE: deleted 1 entries from T_dta2
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-6
7;t really know where to go from here.
If needed, I can open an account to someone who wants to try.
Regards,
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:03:39 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subj
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:03:39 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/tcl regression failed
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> > I have finished bui
Hi,
I have finished buildfarm setup, just waiting for my credentials.
However, I've install tcl 8.5a and regression tests fail like this:
ISTM it's just cosmetic, just want to share...
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/home4/ohp/pgfarmbuild/HEAD/pgsql.24436/src/pl/plperl'
gma
Yep!
I reverted to 1.875 and it works, I'll be a member of build farm soon for
UnixWare.
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:21:20 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Stefan,
Here's my make.log FWIW...
TIA
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:10:09 +0200
> From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bison versio
.)
Many thanks
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:12:07 +0200
> From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> To: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Rosenman
> Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
> Subject: Re: Going for 'all green' buildfarm results
>
> I can take o
>subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Mon
Many thanks for explaining.
I learned something today...
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:59:51 -0800 (PST)
> From: Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] how is that poss
My understanding is that null or not, their should have been a foreign key
violation.
Maybe I misunderstood.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:48:02 -0800 (PST)
> From: Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hacke
Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Mak
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:23:24 -0700
> From: Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] where is the output
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:16:28PM +0100, ohp@pyr
+33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)
07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Hav
pg_dump is STILL emiting alter index.
ISTM we shou make it a warning AND remove it from pg_dump
Regards
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:54:12 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject
1-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream,
stgreql...)
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE E
0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> 'pgsql-hackers list'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:26:20 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Larry Rosenman
> Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, 'pgsql-hackers list'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> "Larry Rosenm
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > Hi Larry,
Hi Larry,
I'm quitge sure you'll see a problem if you remove --enable-debug
--enable-cassert from your ./configure
This is the problem I have.
Regards
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: 25 Jul 2005 09:00:41 -0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
ource file so that I have a look?
BTW this is still on UnixWare 714
Regards,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:28:52 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
> Subject: regressin failure on latest CVS
>
> Hi,
>
>
? | ?column?
--+--
! f| t
(1 row)
-- End of Stats Test
==
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Bruce Momjian
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: Rocco Altier <[EMAIL P
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Bruce Momjian
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: Rocco Altier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org,
> pgsql-ha
> Cc: Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org,
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] regressin failure on latest CVS
>
> This still does not fix the problem.
>
> I had done my patch to try to mimic t
+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a
, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:40:33 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problemsafter crash
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> > I had a crash last night and since while vacuum
1-50-97-00 (Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream,
1-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
