Re: [HACKERS] Crash safe visibility map vs hint bits

2010-12-04 Thread jes...@krogh.cc
>> My imagination is probably not as good, but if you at time A wallog the >> complete map and at A+1 you update a tuple so the visibility bit is cleared >> but the map bit change does not happen due to a crash. Then at wal replay >> time you restore the map from time A and if the tuple change a

Re: [HACKERS] Crash safe visibility map vs hint bits

2010-12-04 Thread jes...@krogh.cc
Den 4 Dec 2010 kl. 08:48 skrev Heikki Linnakangas : > On 04.12.2010 09:14, jes...@krogh.cc wrote: >> There has been a lot discussion about index-only scans and how to make the >> visibillity map crash safe. Then followed by a good discussion about hint >> bits. >> &

[HACKERS] Crash safe visibility map vs hint bits

2010-12-03 Thread jes...@krogh.cc
There has been a lot discussion about index-only scans and how to make the visibillity map crash safe. Then followed by a good discussion about hint bits. What seems to be the main concern is the added wal volume and it makes me wonder if there is a way in-between that looks more like hint bits.