Re: [HACKERS] recursive SQL

2004-06-30 Thread jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Overholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 June 2004 16:45 > To: jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alexander Rüegg > Subject: Re: recursive SQL > > > * jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) <

Re: [HACKERS] recursive SQL

2004-06-29 Thread jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)
, and some friendly words might encourage him to do the required work. cheers, jacob > -Original Message- > From: Potemkin Evgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 June 2004 16:05 > To: jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) > Subject: Re: FW: [HACKERS] recursive SQL > >

Re: [HACKERS] recursive SQL

2004-06-26 Thread jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 June 2004 20:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] recursive SQL > > > > > jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) wrote: > > >hi, > > > >i am wonder

[HACKERS] recursive SQL

2004-06-26 Thread jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)
hi, i am wondering what you think about including evgen potemkin's patch for recursive SQL in the next postgres version: http://gppl.terminal.ru/ cons: - its not standard SQL (uses oracle style syntax) pros: - it would add a feature that many people miss already for ages. all existing workarou