t; > promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers?
> >
> > a) yes
> > b) no
> > c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too
>
I was going to go with b until I saw the suggestion for a PgCon ticket. I
really like that idea.
gabrielle
LSTATE of 02000.
I thought that Pg always generated an appropriate SQLSTATE code, and that
it was just up to $client code to pick up that value, but that doesn't seem
to be the case. Is this part of the SQL standard we don't implement?
Thanks!
gabrielle
x. :)
> Here is version 3 of the patch.
Looks good, and performs as advertised. Thanks!
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
This review was compiled from a PDXPUG group review (Dan Colish, Mark
Wong, Brent Dombrowski, and Gabrielle Roth).
--
We all agree this is a really useful feature. The patch applies
cleanly to the current git master with git apply, it's in context
diff, and does what it's suppose
s like with this patch that's far from being the case.
Correct. Each is handled individually.
Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce
this back to the author?
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your s
of
transaction block" messages.
> I would like multiple -c commands also, as well as a mix of -f and -c.
> Can we add that at the same time please?
I'll leave this one for someone else to answer. :)
gabrielle
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.o
view:
* looks good to me
* fits in with the surrounding code
* no compiler warnings, no crashes
* complete & understandable docs
Personally, I think this rocks. It really improves the readability of
query output.
gabrielle
--
on behalf of the PDXPUG Patch Review Team (Dan, Ma
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Gabrielle of PDXPUG volunteered that PUG to hold a "code sprint" in
> coordination with a commitfest sometime soon. For that event, the PDXPUG
> members would take on a dozen or so patches, compile and review them and
&
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
>> Hi Josh et al,
>>
>> I believe we are all still interested (Selena? Gabrielle?)
Heck yes!
>> How about this: 6:00 Tuesday evening (Pacific), the three of us (an
(cc'ing Webb Sprague because I believe this was actually his
idea...don't want to take credit for it if so. :) )
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Gabrielle of PDXPUG volunteered that PUG to hold a "code sprint" in
> coordination with a commitfes
10 matches
Mail list logo
