Re: [HACKERS] SRF in SFRM_ValuePerCall mode

2008-04-29 Thread dv @ nabble
- Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "dv @ nabble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "pgsql-hackers list" Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRF

Re: [HACKERS] SRF in SFRM_ValuePerCall mode

2008-04-29 Thread dv @ nabble
OK, Thank you for the explanation, I hope this will be implemented in future. We will try and find a workaround to this issue until then. Denis - Original Message - From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "dv @ nabble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[HACKERS] SRF in SFRM_ValuePerCall mode

2008-04-28 Thread dv @ nabble
Hi all, I am working on implementation of custom "C" SRF for our team. The SRF uses SFRM_ValuePerCall mode. I know that sometimes even in SFRM_ValuePerCall mode all the rows returned from SRF are "materialized" (for performing JOINs, for example). But it looks like even in cases when SELECT is ve