Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning

2009-01-26 Thread dpage
On 1/26/09, Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > >>> 1) having the last CF on Nov. 1 was a mistake. That put us square in the >>> path of the US & Christian holidays during the critical integration phase >>> .. >>> which means we haven't really had 3 months of integration, we've had >>> *two*. > > Actuall

Re: [HACKERS] About postgresql8.3.3 build in MS VS2005

2008-10-11 Thread dpage
Hiroshi's ossp-uuid build is the latest win32 build, and what we shipped with 8.3.4. On 10/11/08, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > iihero wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your information. Very appreciated! >> When I convert the file as encoded as UTF-8, there will be no errors. >> For m

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl

2008-09-21 Thread dpage
pgadmin has some umm, interesting queries over pg_depends. It sounds like this change could complicate those. I doubt it's an insurmountable problem of course. On 9/21/08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> A possible objectio

Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling GUCS

2008-08-18 Thread dpage
On 8/18/08, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> The main problem that I've seen described is what I mentioned before: >>> allowing >>> adjusting the postgresql.conf GUC settings by remote u