Hi,
I noticed the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00366.php
isn't in the patch queue. Is the patch OK?
If not please say what is wrong with it.
Thank you,
- Stuart
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lis
I still seem to get a compile problem (included below).
Will double check tomorrow when not so tired (02:15 here).
Cheers,
- Stuart
P.S. My server seems to be blacklisted as a spam server by you. Please
could you white list me.
gcc -O2 -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-I../..
md to be the answer & it seemed to pass the regression
test.
regards,
- Stuart
Bruce Momjian wrote:
deststar, is there any sa_family or ss_family in the cygwin include
directory, perhap with double leading underscores?
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am confused why you didn't like the following patch I posted, which
pulls the family data type length right out of the structure, rather than
having to configure it for every OS that doesn't have sa_family_t?
-
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:54:21PM +0100, deststar wrote:
On cygwin sa_family_t was undeclared, adding the following line:
typedef unsigned short sa_family_t;
to both:
src/port/getaddrinfo.c
src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h
Isn't the attached or fixing Cygwin itself a b
On cygwin sa_family_t was undeclared, adding the following line:
typedef unsigned short sa_family_t;
to both:
src/port/getaddrinfo.c
src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h
seemed to compile ok but with make check there was one regression
failure in test privileges (doesn't look realted, but I'm not sure).
Als
