Re: [HACKERS] why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB?

2001-03-03 Thread xuyifeng
- Original Message - From: Roberto Mello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xuyifeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 10:40 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB? > On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:01:3

Re: [HACKERS] Index grows huge, possible leakage?

2001-02-01 Thread XuYifeng
PostgreSQL hasn't a rewritten storage managent, this is a normal case. Regards XuYifeng - Original Message - From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, Februar

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-11 Thread XuYifeng
s that you are still in 80's, in that time, PC are mostly not connected together via Network, when we need migrate data to another PC, we should use floppy :(, this time I should use the barbarism method again --- dump table to a file then load the file to another database even they are on same server! maybe I should write a stupid program to do task periodically. Regards, XuYifeng

Re: [HACKERS] Why vacuum?

2000-12-13 Thread xuyifeng
ide to use closure source database - SYBASE on linux, we havn't any other selections. :( note that SYBASE and Informix both have 'update statistics' command, but they run it fast in seconds, not block any other user, this is pretty. ya, what's good technology! XuYifeng

Re: [HACKERS] Why vacuum?

2000-12-13 Thread xuyifeng
ide to use closure source database - SYBASE on linux, we havn't any other selections. :( note that SYBASE and Informix both have 'update statistics' command, but they run it fast in seconds, not block any other user, this is pretty. ya, what's good technology! XuYifeng

[HACKERS] pre-beta is slow

2000-12-07 Thread xuyifeng
recently I have downloaded a pre-beta postgresql, I found insert and update speed is slower then 7.0.3, even I turn of sync flag, it is still slow than 7.0, why? how can I make it faster? Regards, XuYifeng

[HACKERS] Re: beta testing version

2000-12-04 Thread xuyifeng
Hi, how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day? can PG7.1 will recover database from system crash? Thanks, XuYifeng

Re: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)

2000-11-29 Thread xuyifeng
Is "if" clause support in PG? for example: "drop table aa if exist" "insert into aa values(1) if not exists select * from aa where i=1" I would like PG support it. --- XuYifeng - Original Message - From: John Huttley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EM

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-11-29 Thread xuyifeng
ion 7.1 of PostgreSQL will live up to your expectations in this area. > > Andreas > Thanks, --- XuYifeng

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-11-28 Thread xuyifeng
rofessional customer, corporation user, we store critical data into database, not your garbage data. Regards, XuYifeng - Original Message - From: Don Baccus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ron Chmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mitch Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-11-28 Thread xuyifeng
it to our Server, I always see myself as a customer, customer is always right. Regards, XuYifeng - Original Message - From: Don Baccus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xuyifeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:16 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-11-28 Thread xuyifeng
no doubt, I have touched some problems PG has, right? if PG is so good, is there any necessary for the team to improve PG again? Regards, XuYifeng - Original Message - From: Don Baccus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xuyifeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-11-28 Thread xuyifeng
Hi, how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day? can PG7.1 will recover database from system crash? Thanks, XuYifeng

[HACKERS] when will PostgreSQL 7.1?

2000-11-26 Thread xuyifeng
Hi, can anyone tell me when Postgresql 7.1 will be released? thanks, XuYifeng

Re: [HACKERS] query plan optimizer bug

2000-11-21 Thread xuyifeng
I did VACUUM ANALYZE, there is no effect. XuYifeng - Original Message - From: Don Baccus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xuyifeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] query plan optimizer bug > At 10

[HACKERS] query plan optimizer bug

2000-11-21 Thread xuyifeng
Hi, it's obviously there is a query plan optimizer bug, if int2 type used in fields, the plan generator just use sequence scan, it's stupid, i am using PG7.03, this is my log file: - stock# drop table a; DROP stock# create table a(i int2, j int); CREATE stock# create unique index idx_a o

Re: [HACKERS] psql: anyone ever notice?

2000-11-19 Thread xuyifeng
all you guy unix? under some shells, both * and ? are expanded to matched file names in current directory by shell, for example FreeBSD's csh. you should use psql -\? to get help screen, this sucks, "?" shouldn't be used as a help screen argument. Regards, XuYifeng --