On Aug 25, 2017 10:45 PM, "Michael Meskes" wrote:
>
> > The v3 patch looks good to me. I've changed this patch status to Ready
> > for Committer.
>
> Thank you all, committed.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
to our attention and
> fixing this missing functionality.
>
> > I have tried to implement it. Please check the attached patch.
> > Please give me feedback.
> > ...
>
> Could you please add a "DO CONTINUE" case to one of the test cases? Or
> add a new one? We would need a test case IMO.
>
Yes I will add test case and send updated patch.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Remi Colinet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've implemented a new command named PROGRESS to monitor progression of
> long running SQL queries in a backend process.
>
> Thank you for the patch.
I am testing your patch but after applying your patch other regression test
fail
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
I have tested the latest patch and it looks good to me,
so I
patch.
Suggestions and comments are helpful to implement this feature.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> >
> > > Here's updated patch. I didn't use version num
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Hi Vinayak,
>
> Thanks for updating the patch! A quick comment:
>
> On 2016/02/26 17:28, poku...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
> >> CREATE VIEW pg_stat_vacuum_progress AS
> >> SELECT S.s[1] as pid,
> >> S.s[2] as relid,
> >>
Hi,
Please find attached updated patch with an updated interface.
On Jan 26, 2016 11:22 AM, "Vinayak Pokale" wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>
> On Jan 26, 2016 9:51 AM, "Amit Langote"
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Vi
Hi Amit,
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
On Jan 26, 2016 9:51 AM, "Amit Langote"
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Vinayak,
>
> On 2016/01/25 20:58, Vinayak Pokale wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please find attached updated patch with an updated interface.
> >
>
>
which are called at the beginning:
void pgstat_report_progress_set_command_target(Oid relid)
Regards,
Vinayak
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2016/01/12 11:28, Vinayak Pokale wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 2016 11:22 AM, "Amit Langote"
> > wrote:
>
Hi,
I found a typo in sequence.c
Please check the attached patch.
Regards,
Vinayak
typo-sequence-c.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
vileged user.
> In the previous patch, it is showing in phase
> column.
Yes. I will update the patch.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
;
> I meant to say "originally proposed pgstat interface on this thread".
Yes.
Robert's comments related to pgstat interface needs to be address.
I will update it.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
D_LAZY_VACUUM.
Added documentation for view.
Some more comments need to be addressed.
Regards,
Vinayak Pokale
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> >> For another thing, there are definitely going to be
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
