[HACKERS] PQsendQuery/ PQgetResult Problem

2011-10-07 Thread Usama Dar
Hi Hackers, I have a strange problem, or maybe it's not a strange problem but just something wrong with my understanding i have SIP router which works with postgresql using libpq, somewhere in the code it inserts a row in the database and then when the insert is finished it invokes another module

Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM FULL out of memory

2008-01-07 Thread Usama Dar
On Jan 7, 2008 2:40 PM, Michael Akinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As suggested, I tested a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE with 128MB shared_buffers > and 512 MB reserved for maintenance_work_mem (on a 32 bit machine with 4 > GB RAM). My Apologies if my question seems redundant and something you have alr

Re: [HACKERS] Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit

2008-01-07 Thread Usama Dar
Doug Knight wrote: We are running the binary distribution, version 8.2.5-1, installed on Windows XP Pro 32 bit with SP2. We typically run postgres on linux, but have a need to run it under windows as well. Our typical admin tuning for postgresql.conf doesn't seem to be as applicable for windows

Re: [HACKERS] Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit

2008-01-06 Thread Usama Dar
On Jan 3, 2008 8:57 PM, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > Is there a place where I can find information about tuning postgresql > running on a Windows XP Pro 32 bit system? I installed using the binary > installer. I am seeing a high page fault delta and total page faults for one >

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum & Table List Ordering

2008-01-03 Thread Usama Dar
On Jan 3, 2008 7:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, feel free to propose a specific ordering. I think you would need > to take table size into account too. Thanks, i thought we were already taking the database size into account somewhat when we calculate the vacuum thresho

[HACKERS] Autovacuum & Table List Ordering

2008-01-02 Thread Usama Dar
OK, so i was going through the autovacuum code and i noticed that when we construct the table list to vacuum in a database per run, we don't process them in a particular order. I mean since we pick the list up from pg_class so it may be ordered on oid? but when we select a database we have a priori

Re: [HACKERS] timetz range check issue

2007-12-25 Thread Usama Dar
On Dec 22, 2007 7:40 PM, Andrew Chernow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Tom Lane wrote: > >>range-checks are present only where needed for the backend to defend > itself > > Survival is very important, but so is maintaining data integrity. IMHO, > data > validation should be as consistent as poss

Re: [HACKERS] Error while sending request to database

2007-12-06 Thread Usama Dar
On Dec 6, 2007 5:26 PM, srinath narra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > when i connecting my postgresql which giving > org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: conversion between UNICODE and > MULE_INTERNAL is not supported.please send solution about this problem. > > Srinath > postgre

Re: [HACKERS] Stored procedure issue

2007-12-02 Thread Usama Dar
On Dec 2, 2007 7:40 AM, Dragan Zubac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I have a stored procedure which does the billing stuff > in our system,it works ok,but if I put in > production,where there is some 5-10 billing events per > second,the whole database slows down. It won't even > drop some

Re: [HACKERS] Release Note Changes

2007-11-30 Thread Usama Dar
On Nov 30, 2007 11:07 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I disagree. For people who want a quick summary of the major > user-facing > > things changed we'll have multiple sources: (a) the announcement, (b) > the > > press features list, (c) the

Re: [HACKERS] Release Note Changes

2007-11-30 Thread Usama Dar
On 11/30/07, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If people understand there aren't 13 performance improvements there are > > at *least* 19+ that is a positive message to help people decide to > > upgrade. > > Frankly I think the release not

Re: [HACKERS] convert int to bytea

2007-11-29 Thread Usama Dar
Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gregory Stark wrote: > > > > > > > What do you want the resulting bytea to look like? > > > > > > > example : id = 9 , bytea = '\000\000\011' IIRC > > > > What do you expect to happen when server and clie

Re: [HACKERS] convert int to bytea

2007-11-29 Thread Usama Dar
Does it matter if you have written an explicit cast for int to bytea? On Nov 29, 2007 9:00 PM, Douglas McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gregory Stark wrote: > > > > > What do you want the resulting bytea to

Re: [HACKERS] PG 7.3 is five years old today

2007-11-29 Thread Usama Dar
+1 On Nov 29, 2007 4:09 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:37:04 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > > > "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:08:58 -0800 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >> Release 7.3.21 with and EOL addend