Re: [HACKERS] Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

2002-05-27 Thread Ulrich Drepper
d 2.2.90 because major pieces are missing. If you still don't know that version numbers are meaningless for determining feature lists you might want to consider going back to your CS101 class and revisit software configuration management. -- ---.

Re: [HACKERS] Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

2002-05-27 Thread Ulrich Drepper
ersion. -- ---. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \,---' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com ` signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [HACKERS] Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

2002-05-23 Thread Ulrich Drepper
his. > But you will end up reverting this change due to pushback > from users. Want to make a side bet? Sure. Especially not everybody is that stubborn. -- ---. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \,---' \ Sunny

Re: [HACKERS] Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

2002-05-23 Thread Ulrich Drepper
y wrong. If you need date manipulation write your own code which work for all the times you want to represent. -- ---. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \,---' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat

Re: [HACKERS] Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug

2002-05-23 Thread Ulrich Drepper
> this with Lamar. Their take is "this is the standard, you should do what > > the standard says and not rely on undocumented, non-standardized sideeffects. > > OK. They must be new guys. :-) Very funny. -- ---.