On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Manuel Cabido wrote:
> I would like to inquire if in the next release of postgresql the database
> will have to be compacted into a single file like what Interbase
> database supports? I find this feature convenient because it will simplify
> the updating of your database con
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Valter Mazzola wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance.
> Is there a way to replace the shmem and sem (ipc.c) to use files. In this
> way we can have a sort of a parallel server using GFS.
...
Besides the slowness of file IO, it also doesn't make sense to have a
shared memory area f
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, mlw wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Does this requested chagne have to do with Apache or PostgreSQL?
> >
> I suspect it is a request that live postgresql processes can linger
> around after a connection is completed and be re-assigned to a new
> connection as soon as
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
> Vadim.
>
> Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
...
What size database was that on?
I looking at
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Junfeng Zhang wrote:
> All the major operating systems should have POSIX threads implemented.
> Actually this can be configurable--multithreads or one thread.
I don't understand this. The OS can be configured for one thread? How
would that be any of use?
> Thread-only s
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
...
> Will Great Bridge step to the plate and fund a truly open source alternative,
> leaving us with a potential code fork? If IB gets its political problems
> under control and developers rally around it, two years is going to be a
> long time to just sit
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, mlw wrote:
> This is just a curiosity.
>
> Why is the default postgres block size 8192? These days, with caching
> file systems, high speed DMA disks, hundreds of megabytes of RAM, maybe
> even gigabytes. Surely, 8K is inefficient.
I think it is a pretty wild assumption
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Alain Toussaint wrote:
> > "I have all sorts of client apps, connecting in different ways, to
> > my server. Some of the clients are leaving their connections open,
> > but unused. How can I prevent running out of backends, and boot
> > the inactive users off?"
>
> how abou
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001116 12:09] wrote:
> > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001116 14:02]:
> > > > > This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.
> > > > Question: Is sleep(0) guaranteed to at least give up control?
> > >
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
> >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> >significantly above 10/sec?
>
> I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
> using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additio
10 matches
Mail list logo
