Re: [HACKERS] bug in 7.3.2

2006-03-01 Thread Suvarna
Hello Tom, thankyou for the reply but, actually the number which are missing are in the range of 20-30 and at the max only 3 transactions are going on at any given point in time. So if 3 numbers are missing then it was understood the missing numbers are very large. Regards, suvarna

Re: [HACKERS] bug in 7.3.2

2006-03-01 Thread Suvarna
Hello Jonah,   No we are not caching the sequence In the transaction for the first time we use next val & then on we use curretn val.   Regards, Suvarna   - Original Message - From: Jonah H. Harris To: Suvarna Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Sent: Tue

[HACKERS] bug in 7.3.2

2006-02-28 Thread Suvarna
we are using postgresql 7.3.2 version. We are facing a problem in nextval of sequence. The problem is as follows, If the server shuts down abrupotly because of power failuar or any othercause then the sequences tend to skip few numbers.After restarting the server the nextval of sequence does