14:43
To: Steve King
Cc: 'Hannu Krosing'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Duplicate oids!
Steve King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ctids are different however vaccum is run on this table and the record
> is updated.
It would be useful to look a
greatly appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 December 2002 11:54
To: Steve King
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Duplicate oids!
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:27, Steve King wrote:
> > -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve King
> Sent: 12 December 2002 11:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Duplicate oids!
>
> Forgive me if this is a previous question but I cannot find any
> information on it in any of the mailing lists
ound other than the mailing list?
Thanks again.
Regards
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 October 2002 15:48
To: Steve King
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bad rules
Steve King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am usin
I am using postgres 7.2, and have rule on a table which causes a notify if
an insert/update/delete is performed on the table.
The table is very very small.
When performing a simple (very simple) update on the table this takes about
3 secs, when I remove the rule it is virtually instantaneous.
The
I have postgres 7.0 working on a red hat 7.1 installation, but now need to
upgrade to postgres 7.2.1 to have the benefit of non-locking vacuuming.
Is it possible to install postgresql 7.2.1 on to a red hat 7.1 installation?
I've been trying but it complains that it can't find dependencies
libssl.
