- Original Message -
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 06, 2005 3:48 AM
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 05:38 schrieb Oleg Bartunov:
> > Serguei, I have translations (I didn't touch libpq, psql in work,
> > other files seems complete) available from
> > http://www.
Hello Peter,
I was about to update initdb translation, but noticed
that newly introduced error messages in the code have
German-style quotes. These propagated to the .po files now...
It happened in this commit:
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/bin/initdb/initdb.c.diff?r1=1.
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200
> From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why is the encoding WIN 1250 only for the client side? It seems that
> with the new Windows port, folks will be interested in using it on the
> server side.
Then what about WIN1251 (Cyrillic)? :) And all t
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 08, 2004 2:27 PM
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:03:22 -0300 (ADT)
> From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Releasing 7.4.3 ...
> Next Monday, we're going to put out a 7.4.3 release, incorporating all the
> little pat
> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:57:30 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "Gaetano Mendola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This seems inappropriate to me. Are you going to suggest that every
> >> routine that takes a pointer parameter needs to ex
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 03, 2003 6:31 PM
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > The system tables are not the problem. pg_upgrade has shown how we
> > can have cross-version upgrades no matter how much the system catalogs
> > change (a good thing too,
hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through...
re-attempt
- Original Message -
From: "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III
> - Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Copeland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 03, 2003 4:45 PM
> > > (1) One thread screws up, the whole process dies. In a
> > > multiple process
> > > application this is not too much of an issue.
> >
> > If you use C++ you can try/catch and nothing bad
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Copeland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 03, 2003 10:49 AM
> If you run, "gcc", at the prompt (preferably the one you're trying to
> run configure from), do you get something like, "gcc: No input files" or
> do you get, "gcc: command not found"? If yo
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM
> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", long, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", short, desc)
> > #endif
>
> > seems relat
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 1:58 PM
> "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Looks good to me, but there is still a little inconvenience
> > of multiline option descrip
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 9:29 AM
> Maybe we should not try to be cute, but just do
>
> #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", long, desc)
> #else
> #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 1:34 AM
> Perhaps it would work better to do something like
>
> #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG
> char* f_option = _("-f, --file=FILENAME ");
> ... etc ...
> #else /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
> char* f_option = _
Hello,
Happy New Year everyone,
Attached is an attempt to eliminate duplicate pg_dump
option descriptions, and have a single description for both
short and long options. For me, as for a translator, this
eliminates the need to maintain the two, exactly same, sets of
24 sentences.
If this is acc
Hi,
Can I still send in translation patches so that they
get into 7.4 or is it too late already? If it's not
late, what would be the 'deadline' then?
Thanks,
--
Serguei A. Mokhov
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier PRENANT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: September 04, 2002 12:18 PM
> I think I figured why I can't buil plperl on unixware 711/OpenUnix 800.
>
> It seems Makefile.shlib has changed between 722 and 73 and -z text has
> been added. However with this on, it
I'm inclined to go to that thesis defense. Sounds
quite interesting :)
-s
- Original Message -
From: "MONKIEWICZ Halina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:14 PM
Subject: [General] master thesis defence, Xin Shen, Wed. March 2
- Original Message -
From: Bill Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > It means that when you want to use one of the built in functions
> > > (date_part, abs, floor, sqrt etc.) you don't have to prefix it with
> > > "standard.". You can just say date_
- Original Message -
From: Bill Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 8:22 AM
> My description of namespaces seems to have caused a fair bit of confusion.
> Let me try again.
>
> The ability of the package changes to automatically check standard when
> you give a
- Original Message -
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:25 PM
> > > I just thought I would point out that could get
> > > messy and many projects realizing this have created a po directory off the
> > > source tree to store the translations in. I
Kelly Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> SO...I dug around through the code a little and found where the error was
> coming from and changed the code so that if the open attempt with O_RDWR
> fails, the code tries again
- Original Message -
From: Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:12 AM
> > Which ones belong to the backend and which ones to the frontend?
> > Or even more: which ones belong to the backend, which ones
> > to the frontend #1, which ones to the frontend #2,
- Original Message -
From: Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:47 PM
> > My question is now how many BE's/FE's would you return encodings for?
>
> I don't quite understand your question. What I thought were something
> like this:
>
> SELECT pg_available
- Original Message -
From: Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 7:58 PM
> > 3) Is there a way to query available encodings in PostgreSQL for display in
> > pgAdmin.
> > Is it a planned feature in PostgreSQL 7.2? This would be nice if it existed.
> > Example:
- Original Message -
From: bpalmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:36 PM
> Since there have been drastic CVS changes, the web page doc should REALLY
> be updated...
>
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/cvs.html
... and CVSweb put back on-l
Just discovered, by mistyping the www address...
Interesting, whom does this one belong to?
http://www.postgresql.ca.org
--
Serguei A. Mokhov
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(se
- Original Message -
From: Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:41 PM
> While checking out TOT pgsql today onto an HFS+ file system (case-preserving,
>case-insensitive), I hit the following CVS conflict:
>
> pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/utf8_to_al
- Original Message -
From: Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 1:37 PM
> CVSWeb is going to be broken for a day or two, while Vince and I work out
> some issues as regards moving the main www site over to the same server
> ... but thanks for pointing it
- Original Message -
From: Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 1:05 PM
> Now, I don't imagine it being *that* simple to move it over, so please let
> me know if anyone sees any errors on commits or stuff like that ...
CVSweb seems to be screwed up.
It
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM
> > I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not
> > for
> > any other reason then for confusing people and making them have
> > discussions
> > like this.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM
> > I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not
> > for
> > any other reason then for confusing people and making them have
> > discussions
> > like this.
>
>
Hi All,
Looking at my message about the bug webpage and
some other posts, I see that it was delayed for
about 2h and a half. Some of the post were
delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like
the list has problems of some sort which cause
these irregular delays.
Just an annoying observation.
S.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:48 AM
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Not only does it show the problems he had with PostgreSQL, he uses our
> > > bug list as an example of how PostgreSQL isn't
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 3:40 AM
> Hi all,
>
> For a few months now I've been thinking about whether or not a guide
> ('line-by-line') to the Postgres source tree would be of any value.
[snip]
> So, what do people th
- Original Message -
From: Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 10:02 PM
> ALT -> IBM866
Just a quick comment: ALT is not necessarily IBM866.
It can be any US-ASCII or 26-character-alphabet Latin set, for example
IBM819 or ISO8859-1. Is actually quite d
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:09 AM
> typedef struct FormData_pg_sequence
> {
> NameData sequence_name;
> int64 last_value;
> #ifdef INT64_IS_BUSTED
> int32 pad1;
[snip]
> } FormData_pg_sequence;
>
> This would work, I think,
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:28 AM
> "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This would work, I think, but my goodness it's an ugly solution.
>
> > Is anything wro
----
From: Serguei Mokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Translators wanted
> Hello Peter,
>
> There was a little typo in line 73 in the original file libpq.pot:
>
> #: fe-conne
The same applies as to my previous post...
Sorry again.
S.
- Original Message -
From: Serguei Mokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Translators wanted
> - Original Messag
Hi all,
- Original Message -
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 6:13 PM
> Those of you who wanted to help translating the messages of PostgreSQL
> programs and libraries, you can get started now. I've put up a page
> explaini
Sorry, forgot to post to the list...
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Being a simple user, I still want to view the stats from the table,
> > but it should be limited only
Being a simple user, I still want
to view the stats from the table,
but it should be limited only
to the stuff I own. I don't wanna
let others see any of my info, however.
The SU's, of course, should be able to read
all the stats.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Casey Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, a
43 matches
Mail list logo
