Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Point in Time Recovery WAS: Hot Backup

2002-10-09 Thread Sandeep Chadha
e Sandeep. -Original Message- From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:19 PM To: Sandeep Chadha Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general Subject: [GENERAL] Point in Time Recovery WAS: Hot Backup Hi Sandeep. What you were calling Hot Backup is rea

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-09 Thread Sandeep Chadha
pgsql-general Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Hot Backup Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote: > > > "Sandeep Chadha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgre

Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-07 Thread Sandeep Chadha
, October 07, 2002 1:48 PM To: Sandeep Chadha Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup "Sandeep Chadha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres > 7.3b2 and still don't

[HACKERS] Hot Backup

2002-10-07 Thread Sandeep Chadha
Hello to all the Doers of Postgres!!! Last time I went through forums, people spoke highly about 7.3 and its capability to do hot backups. My problem is if the database goes down and I lose my main data store, then I will lose all transactions back to the time I did the pg_dump. Other database