2015-11-30 0:39 GMT-02:00 Tom Lane:
> Rodrigo Hjort writes:
> > I created a custom C function with this signature:
>
> > CREATE FUNCTION calculate_hash(numbers int2[])
> > RETURNS int8
> > AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', 'pg_calculate_hash'
> >
The whole project is on GitHub:
https://github.com/hjort/mega-sena/tree/master/src
Best regards,
--
Rodrigo Hjort
www.hjort.co
The whole project is on GitHub:
https://github.com/hjort/mega-sena/tree/master/src
Best regards,
--
Rodrigo Hjort
www.hjort.co
//git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3e3087d8717c26cd1c4581ba29274ac214eb816
>
>regards, tom lane
>
I modified my code by calling *palloc0()* instead and that issue no longer
appears. :D
Thanks, Tom Lane!
--
Rodrigo Hjort
www.hjort.co
the same.
1) Do you have any clue on what could be happening and how to solve this
issue, please?
2) Sometimes the value returned by *to_tsquery()* has a ":*" suffix. What
does that mean?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
--
Rodrigo Hjort
www.hjort.co
()')
rot-> AS (usr name, db name);
usr| db
--+
postgres | escola
(1 registro)
This way, I fear DBLink functions should become a vulnerability issue on my
database.
Is there any way to protect or override this setting? Or it should be done
on pg_hba.conf only
Dear Hackers,
Could you point me the first version PostgreSQL started to support
Deferred Constraints (ie: DEFERRABLE keyword on foreign keys
creation)? I guess it is earlier than 7.0, right?
--
Regards,
Rodrigo Hjort
http://icewall.org/~hjort
---(end of broadcast
know-how on the backend internals, how difficult
is it to develop this (3 operators + 1 index type)?
--
Best regards,
Rodrigo Hjort
http://icewall.org/~hjort
CELEPAR - Cia de Informática do Paraná - Brasil
http://www.pr.gov.br
How about those "pg_ts*" tables, which are specific for a database? Will they serve to the whole cluster?2006/6/7, Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:OpenFTS never, but tsearch2 is possible. But it requires enough work to do, so I
have doubt that it will be done in 8.2...-- Rodrigo Hjorthttp://i
Oleg,
Actually I got PG 8.1.4 compiled from source on a Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.16-k7-2.
My locale is pt_BR, but I configured TSearch2 to use rules from the 'simple'.
Then I just followed the instructions from the link. The fact is that it only works at the first time.
Regards,
Rodrigo
Sorry, but I thought it that was the most appropriate list for the issue.I was following these instructions:http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/docs/custom-dict.html
And what happens is that the function works just once. Perhaps a malloc/free issue?$ psql fuzzyfuzzy=# select to_t
* from table where field like 'THE NAME%'; -- index scanselect * from table where field like '%THE NAME%'; -- seq scanselect * from table where field like :bind_param; -- seq scan (always)Regards,
Rodrigo Hjort
http://icewall.org/~hjort
%' on static text or bound paremeter, makes the planner always do a sequential scan. Is that the scenario?-- Rodrigo Hjorthttp://icewall.org/~hjort
2006/5/23, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Rodrigo Hjort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> What happens is that only the "004
PG-Hackers,I got the following picture:detran=# \d sa_dut.tb_usuario Table "sa_dut.tb_usuario" Column | Type | Modifiers-+-+---
numprocesso | bigint
Thanks all. I'm gonna try other locales and encodings.2006/3/29, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Rodrigo Hjort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> The fact is that I can't raise PostgreSQL with C encoding, as special> characters are used on most tables.
You're c
Yeah, I think there's a problem on Linux locales.Using the C locale, it works as expected:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ export LC_ALL=C && cat test.txt | sortGABRIEL ALCIDES KLIM PERONDIGABRIEL ALEXANDRE DA SILVA MANICA
GABRIELA HELEDA DE SOUZAGABRIELA JACOBY NOSGABRIELA LETICIA BATISTA NUNESBut when using
Pg-Hackers,I'm having the following issue:create table aluno (id serial, nome varchar(60));rodrigo=# select * from aluno order by nome offset 35 limit 5; id | nome+---
36 | GABRIELA HELEDA DE SOUZA 37 | GABRIELA JACOBY NOS 38 | GABRIEL ALCIDES KLIM
Well, actually we're ain't gonna do this procedure regularly, but just in case of failure - if it ever happens.For the moment, I did the dump/restore and it worked, but took almost 1 hour, due to tsearch2 indexes on a table.
Yeah, I thought 64-bit data could be stored on other files than pg_control
Dear PostgreSQL Hackers,We got a PG 8.1 on a Debian 64 bits, which does a full backup (PITR) daily.Then we installed a Debian 32 bits (actually, it's on VMWare) and wanted to restore the previous PG cluster on it.
As there are a lot of indexes, specially GiST, "pg_dump" and "pg_restore" are not via
I'm having some problems when using "pfree()" on functions in C.Calling it on "psql" gives the exception below on both versions of function "insert()" [1,2] if "pfree()" is enabled:
server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before o
20 matches
Mail list logo