On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
> > > -Wmissing-declarations prod -I../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE
> > > -I/usr/include -c -o path.o path.c
> > > gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, julius wrote:
> im not sure if this is the correct mailing list, please correct me if it is not.
> my gcc is version 3.2, configure runs fine i deativated readline-support...but this
> error occours:
>
> gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declar
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 17:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > > Depending on what part of the source you're interested in, a book on
> > > > DBMS implementation might also be useful, such as
> >
> > > Wow, $100.
I just got my copy of SysAdmin Magazine and was surprised to see an
article about Usogres -- The PostgreSQL Replication Tool.
I don't remember seeing it mentioned on this or the General list. Though
I just started reading the article and don't have a firm grasp on it yet,
I do remember a discus
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> > I see files truncated at 1Gb on my Linux server:
> >
> > -rw---1 postgres users855490560 Aug 6 20:53 795261707.2
> > -rw---1 postgres users943259648 Aug 8 23:34 823049708
> > -rw---1 postgres users1073741824 Au
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Chris Humphries wrote:
> well that and people tend to drift towards an easy answer,
> like php... amazing how that combo is so popular... hrrmm...
Well people seem to get so ... about php that I didn't want to touch that
topic.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> e) Inertia. MySQL got more popular way back when; the reasons may no longer
> apply, but nobody is going to move to PostgreSQL without _compelling_ reason,
> and you'll have to show something _really compelling_.
I would like to add one o
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:
> What would be good is IMHO to have GRANT|REVOKE CONNECT which defaults
> to REVOKE, so only superusers and the DB owner can connect, but that the
> owner later can change it without the need to edit hba.conf.
Oh, yes. Me too please. I think something clo
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This is inconsistent with the official IANA assignment which reads
Thanks. I'll update my services file and check all those I come into
contact with. I'll check if a new install if Redhat 7.3 has the correct
entries this weekend.
> postgresql
I see PostgreSQL in /etc/services on an upgraded Redhat Linux 7.3 system.
Don't think it was me adding it since I didn't have PG running on the
system.
Rod
--
Please don't tell my mother I'm a System Administrator.
She thinks I play piano in a bordello.
-
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. That's a possibility. There's some potential for trouble if an
> application is expecting an int4 result from "SELECT nextval()" and
> gets int8 instead, but if we think we could live with that...
I assume there will be the same limitations as you men
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Just a quick question, when a column of a table is defined to be a foreign
> key, is it implicitly indexed, or does one still need to explicitly CREATE
> INDEX?
I don't think you can actually declare the column in the table as a
foreign key.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In general, RPMs only work on systems that are the same as the one they
> were built on, for various degrees of "same". If you're not picking up
> the RPMs from your distributor or you're sure that the builder used the
> same version as you have, it
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Ok, consider my mind changed. :-). My only concerns were, due to some
> feedback I have gotten, is that people would treat the RPM release as
> _productions_ rather than beta -- but maybe I'm just being paranoid.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean
14 matches
Mail list logo
