On 11/15/09 2:25 AM PST, "Simon Riggs" wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:43 -0800, Robert Hodges wrote:
>
>> I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on
>> Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial
&g
Hi Simon and Heikki,
I can help set up automated basic tests for hot standby using 1+1 setups on
Amazon. I¹m already working on tests for warm standby for our commercial
Tungsten implementation and need to solve the problem of creating tests that
adapt flexibly across different replication mecha
Hi Greg and Fujii,
Just a point on terminology: there's a difference in the usage of
semi-synchronous between DRBD and MySQL semi-synchronous replication, which
was originally developed by Google.
In the Google case semi-synchronous replication is a quorum algorithm where
clients receive a comm
ql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
ynchronous. PostgreSQL will eventually be far better
as these discussions boil down into designs.
Thanks, Robert
On 8/12/08 8:51 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert Hodges wrote:
>> Could you expand on why logical
... so ... well, it's barely worth laughing at.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
--
Rob
management headache of ensuring that triggers are correctly installed. It
seems as if one of these generic approaches could hook into WAL record
transport.
Cheers, Robert
On 7/10/08 4:56 AM, "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/10/08, Robert Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ct me directly. Meanwhile, we are quite serious about this problem
and intend to work on helpful additions to PostgreSQL in this area. I will
post more as we make progress.
Thanks, Robert
--
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.s., Happy 12th birthday everyone!
he right thing to do.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> +1. Doesn't make much sense to me either.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> andrew
>>
>> ---(end of broadcast)---
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our li
Hi Hannu,
Hi Hannu,
On 6/1/08 2:14 PM, "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As a consequence, I don¹t see how you can get around doing some sort
>> of row-based replication like all the other databases.
>
> Is'nt WAL-base replication "some sort of row-based replication" ?
>
Yes, in t
5/29/08 8:16 PM, "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Robert Hodges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Third, you can't stop with just this feature. (This is the BUT part of the
> post.) The use cases not covered by this featu
ight.
Cheers, Robert
On 5/29/08 9:05 PM, "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/08, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:18PM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
> > people are starting to get religion on this issue I would st
NTT slides were really great. Takahiro and Masao deserve
congratulations on an absolutely first-rate presentation.
On 5/29/08 9:09 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:18PM -0700, R
ut how to let slaves run
read-only queries. But even without read-only queries, this will be
a useful improvement for HA/backup scenarios.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://ww
help us avoid a
number of unnecessary failures in master/master replication. If anything
else about this raises hackles on your neck (or anyone else's for that
matter) please let me know. It's better to know now. :)
Cheers, Robert
On 5/9/08 4:53 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL
inistic order? Or can it vary based on
load, lock manager state, etc., so that sometimes you get 'y' and sometimes
'z' as the final result?
If this case turns out to be deterministic, are there other cases that come
to mind that would turn out to be non-deterministic?
Thanks,
ifies tool implementation.
We have an application at Continuent that depends on exactly this behavior.
I was investigating PostgreSQL semantics just last week and was delighted to
find they appear to be exactly right. Oracle on the other hand is going to
be a pain...
Cheers,
Robert Hodges
On 1
"normal" test frameworks.
Cheers, Robert
Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Mark Wong wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:15:02 +
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2
18 matches
Mail list logo
