Re: [HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-08 Thread Pete Stevenson
some analysis along these lines, but I’m looking for an independent result that confirms (or not) his work. Thank you, Pete Stevenson > On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On 7 July 2016 at 20:50, Pete Stevenson <mailto:etep.nosnev...@gmail.com>> wrote: > H

Re: [HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-07 Thread Pete Stevenson
ce, we do have a database that can use MVCC. It should be possible to figure out how much work goes into maintaining that property. Thank you, Pete On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 7 July 2016 at 17:45, Pete Stevenson wrote: > >> Hi postgresql hackers

[HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-07 Thread Pete Stevenson
, the overhead of version checking and version creation, and of garbage collecting old and unnecessary versions? For what it’s worth, I am working on a research project where it is envisioned that some of this work can be offloaded. Thank you, Pete Stevenson -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing