Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
>>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06-Feb-01 12:39:24 AM >>> > "Nic Ferrier" wrote: >>>> - the postmaster was being started without nohup Oliver wrote: >> If postmaster is being started by init, it should not need >> nohup, be
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
ecause postgres handles the decision about syslog depending on the conf file. - the postmaster was being started without nohup - the system for setting options wasn't very usefull the system that I've replaced it with isn't terribly usefull either but it works. So anyway, my