I'm just a user, not a contributer, but I've read -hackers long enough
to remember the many discussions over the years about bug trackers, and
the consensus always seemed to come back to "if it doesn't fit our
mailing-list-based workflow, it's going to fail."
I happened upon mention of a new bug t
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> Unless you use something like pgpool, in which case a single session
> may include multiple requests.
Actually, I've found pgpool to be no better when it comes to using
real prepared queries---there's no guarantee that any given request is
going to connect to the
"Gary Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm thinking of buying "Practical PostgreSQL" from O'Reilly.
>
> Has anyone got any comments on this book?
As Christopher Browne pointes out, some of the information is
outdated.
My real criticism, though, would be that *far* too much of a book
abou
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Artistic License doesn't even qualify as Free Software as far as the
> FSF is concerned.
Errr, http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html lists it as not
only Free Software but GPL-compatible.
Mike.
---(end of broadca
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able
> > to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is
> > specified?
> Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services?
Debia
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael seems to feel that the tuple count should be nonzero if any
> of the replacement operations did anything at all. This does not
> make a lot of sense at the command tag level ("UPDATE 4" might not
> mean that 4 tuples were updated) but if you look at
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are confusing client behavior (by which I meant application)
> with library behavior. In libpq terms, an application that's sent
> an INSERT command might expect to be able to retrieve an OID with
> PQoidValue(). Whether the library avoids core-dumping
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My impression (I could be wrong) is that LISTEN/NOTIFY doesn't get
> the press that it deserves. If this model isn't widely used because
> of some deficiencies in the LISTEN/NOTIFY implementation, IMHO our
> time would be better spent fixing those problems
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are really no other decent CMSs available that support
> PostgreSQL.
bricolage.thepirtgroup.com/
Mike.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgr
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there is something functionally wrong with Readline then let's talk
> about it, but let's not replace it with something because some PHP dude
> said that RMS said something.
ncftp used to be for non-commercial use only and had hooks to be
linked a
10 matches
Mail list logo
