Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 02:20:53PM -0400 I heard the voice of David Blewett, and lo! it spake thus: > > Sorry for top-posting... I was under the impression that git over http was > just as efficient since 1.6.6 [1]. That's about talking over HTTP to a git server running as CGI; it doesn't help if

Re: [HACKERS] git: uh-oh

2010-08-17 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:57:02PM -0600 I heard the voice of Alex Hunsaker, and lo! it spake thus: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 13:52, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > How sure are we that its not the cvs2svn step that is screwing it up? > > urp, I jumped to a conclusion while skimming the cvs2git.options

Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:06:57PM -0500 I heard the voice of Neil Conway, and lo! it spake thus: > > The ability to do history-sensitive merges actually results in a > significant reduction in the need for manual conflict resolution. I would say that a far greater contributor in practice would s

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:28:20PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: > > I don't really drink this koolaid, at least not to the extent of > disavowing what I said above. Oh, don't take my message as "You're wrong, you're not taking into account [...]". It was mean

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:27:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: > > This decision really belongs to the handful of people who do most of > the maintenance and live with most of any CVS pain that exists: such > as Tom, Bruce, Peter, Neil, Alvaro. Othe people hav

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

2006-07-18 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 02:19:01PM -0400 I heard the voice of Tom Lane, and lo! it spake thus: > > I did some experimentation just now, and could not get mysql to accept a > command longer than about 1 million bytes. It complains about > Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess

2006-01-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:30:47PM - I heard the voice of Andrew - Supernews, and lo! it spake thus: > On 2006-01-25, Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This isn't an obscure old-fashioned thing. People really do use > > this syntax. > > Given how little code now supports 10.1 meaning 1

Re: [HACKERS] Autotools update

2005-07-03 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:46:19PM +0200 I heard the voice of Peter Eisentraut, and lo! it spake thus: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output? > > If it did not, why would they bother making a separate package > called "gnu-autoconf" with the note "This p

Re: [HACKERS] The Contrib Roundup (long)

2005-06-08 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:50:06PM -0300 I heard the voice of Marc G. Fournier, and lo! it spake thus: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:21:46PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >>Why would it destroy the history? Its easy enough to move the files to a

Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary PITR documentation available

2004-08-04 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:27:35PM -0400 I heard the voice of Mike Mascari, and lo! it spake thus: > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > >"The ability to restore the database to a previous point in time creates > >some complexities that are akin to science-fiction stories about time > >travel and