ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Marshall, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have developed a small patch to optimizer/util/plancat.c that
eliminates one of hte caveats associated with constraint exclusions,
namely the inabil
I have developed a small patch to optimizer/util/plancat.c that
eliminates one of hte caveats associated with constraint exclusions,
namely the inability to avoid searching tables based on the results of
stable functions. The new code expands non-volatile functions into
constant values so the
But forcing a reload of pltcl.so is nothing but a kluge --- it leaks
memory like there's no tomorrow, and it's only an accident that it fails
to crash. I don't want to design a further kluge on top of it.
Are you saying that pltcl.so leaks memory in general, or that forcing a
reload of the plt
"Marshall, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Is the invalidation of stored plans going to be part of 8.2? If
> not, any idea when it would be available? I'd be willing to work on
> this, if it would help.
No, it did not get done; feel free to work
Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:08 PM
To: Marshall, Steve
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] - Proposal for repreparing prepared statements
Stephen Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following is a proposal for work I'd
