Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Current-stream read for psql's \copy

2004-02-15 Thread Mark Feit
Bruce Momjian writes: > > I will do it by vote, not because _I_ decide it is unintuitive. And I > don't have to talk _you_ into it, just a majority of developers. Well, here's my vote on the subject: I purposefully avoided changing the existing behavior because (a) it would break something I

Re: [HACKERS] (Mis?)Behavior of \copy with -f and \i

2004-01-04 Thread Mark Feit
Peter Eisentraut writes: > > [Patch to make psql's \copy read from the current input, not just > the standard input or a file.] > > I'm not sure about the proposed syntax, but the feature sounds quite > reasonable. I have a patch written for this that uses the "-" syntax: \copy junk

[HACKERS] (Mis?)Behavior of \copy with -f and \i

2003-12-24 Thread Mark Feit
Greetings... I've run into a problem with the way \copy behaves when psql is reading its input from a file using either the -f command line option or the \i command. (Not that it matters in this case, but this is PostgreSQL 7.4 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled with gcc.) The following... ---8<--S

[HACKERS] (Mis?)Behavior of \copy with -f and \i

2003-12-23 Thread Mark Feit
Greetings... I've run into a problem with the way \copy behaves when psql is reading its input from a file using either the -f command line option or the \i command. (Not that it matters in this case, but this is PostgreSQL 7.4 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled with gcc.) The following... ---8<--S