Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> You can use distributed revision control systems as centralized
> systems, but not vice-versa.
>
Not true, the other way around exists, that is what svk does.
> As far as understanding the simplicity of arch (if you wanted to
> understand the problems it solves
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
What's needed is a good window client like WinCVS, however...
Chris
There is a number of those, our shop uses (and makes programs for) both
windows and unix (and might soon use mac's aswell), so it's very
important that there exists a good client for each. Especia
Jeff wrote:
Do you have any system monitoring scripts that may be killing it as it
may look like a "runaway" process?
We've had this happen to us before. You tend to forget about things like
that.
This got me thinking, and i rechecked all possibilities.
It turned out that we changed rlimit polici
Doug McNaught wrote:
"Magnus Naeslund(t)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have this big table running on an old linux install (kernel 2.2.25).
I've COPYed some tcpip logs into a table created as such:
Linux is probably killing your process because it (the kernel) is low
on m
I have this big table running on an old linux install (kernel 2.2.25).
I've COPYed some tcpip logs into a table created as such:
create table ipstats (time timestamp, src inet, dst inet, npackets int8,
nbytes int8);
Big:
select count(*) from ipstats;
count
--
99173733
When i do two s
