[HACKERS] log shipping and nextval sequences

ing like that? Does it make sense to create a GUC to control the log_cnt amount rather than SEQ_LOG_VALS approach? version: 8.3.7 regards, -Leo -- Leonardo Cezar http://postgreslogia.wordpress.com http://www.dextra.com.br/postgres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@pos

Re: [HACKERS] One more option for pg_dump...

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:33 PM, David BOURIAUD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le lundi 25 février 2008, Leonardo Cezar a écrit : > > Hi Leonardo, > Thanks for your quick answer, I didn't know it was a TODO item, and that > somepeople were working on it... Keep goi

Re: [HACKERS] One more option for pg_dump...

d thing ? Yep! Hence it's a todo item :-) > Are there workarounds to have the same comportement that I'm not aware of ? Alot of lines sed+awk+pg_dump scripts .. -Leo -- Leonardo Cezar et all http://www.dextra.com.br/postgres http://www.postgresql.org.br ---