On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> It's certainly true that a large fraction of contrib modules should be
>> relocatable in that sense, because they just contain C functions that
>> aren't going to care.
>
> As they all currently are using the SET search_path TO public; trick
On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" writes:
>>> What about unaccent? Or lo (1 domain, 2 functions)?
>>
>> Sure. Doesn't have to actually do anything.
>
> Ok, so that's already in the patch :)
No, it's not. There are no unit tests at all. You can call the co
On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Chris Browne wrote:
> Other possibilities include TRANSIENT, EPHEMERAL, TRANSIENT, TENUOUS.
EVANESCENT.
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hacke
