oncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: Katie Ward
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Win32 Technical Questions
>
>
> >Can the ConsoleApp thing be written in C so we don't have to get an
> >extra C++ compiler for one
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have prepared a little patch that makes room for a native Windows build
> in our existing build framework. The Cygwin port would be renamed to
> "cygwin" and the new port takes over the "win" name. I have prepared the
> port specific template and makefile and extracted
Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:02 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Vince Vielhaber; Katie Ward; Curtis Faith;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>
> Katie, can I get the latest build from anywhere?
>
> Regards, Dave.
---
27;ve been listening to the pros and cons for a while, and they've been
really interesting. However, to assume without ever using the native
Windows port that it is automatically a "poor stepchild" is unbelievable.
I believe that the port, as submitted, can be used as an i
TECTED]
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@;postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Steve Howe
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:43 AM
> To: Katie Ward
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
>
> Hello Katie,
>
> Thursday, November 7, 2002, 7:08:20 PM, you wrot
d the
issue will get resolved more quickly.
There is still some cleanup work to do, such as migrating from 7.2.1 to 7.4,
but my company is committed to contributing this port to the community by
the end of the year.
Regards,
Katie Ward
Principal Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
d the
issue will get resolved more quickly.
There is still some cleanup work to do, such as migrating from 7.2.1 to 7.4,
but my company is committed to contributing this port to the community by
the end of the year.
Regards,
Katie Ward
Principal Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
