Re: Temprary issue gripes(was:Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem)

2001-10-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday 05 October 2001 07:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > I made it clear I was getting frustrated. Read in that context, I think it > > was pretty mild;-) > > But it was done in

Re: [HACKERS] Beta Wednesday

2001-10-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Are we ready for beta on Wednesday? I don't know anything holding us up > at this point. Seems like major work has stopped and everyone is ready > to start testing. Well, if that build problem I reported doesn't bother you;-) I think it's likely to

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread John Summerfield
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > > > I don't think I was being rude. It's true I'm no diplomat. I've > > criticised actions (and, I think, with considerable justice), but I've > >

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread John Summerfield
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday 04 October 2001 09:40 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > Well, remember I only arrived here in the past two weeks. What I've seen > > has not been reassuring. > > May I be so bold as to suggest your taking a few hours

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2001 07:53 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > > > Time to get your act together fellas. > &g

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote: > of the message this was in response to which appears to be what Lamar was > responding to. Besides, there's a far cry from a message of constructive > criticism and the message this was in response to. The point that the > documentation and reality ne

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > It seems you don't have to be new here to be a bit peeved about things;-( > [snip] > > Time to get your act together fellas. > > This is open source John, not

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Script attached. I could poll cvs more frequently but it seems rude to > hit the cvs server more frequently than every 15 minutes. If people > want

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Marc, > > > > it worked, but now I'm again getting: > > > > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied > > cvs

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-10-02 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just about to be moved to the new server, now that the new 18gi drive has > > > > been installed ... plan on getting that done this afternoon ... > > > > > > Don't rush. I am

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > > is the same as the CVS directory. > > It is the anoncvs server that's broken. The committers don't seem to be > having any problem with

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-09-30 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > just about to be moved to the new server, now that the new 18gi drive has > > been installed ... plan on getting that done this afternoon ... > > Don't rush. I am setting up my system to check the SGML docs every 15 > minutes and rebuild if

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-14 Thread John Summerfield
> John Summerfield writes: > > > I'd point out this from the INSTALL document: > > --prefix=PREFIX > > > > Install all files under the directory PREFIX instead of > > /usr/local/pgsql. The actual files will be installed into vario

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-10 Thread John Summerfield
ually the reason it gave for not installing the perl bits is that I didn't have the authority. It would have been completely happy if I'd been root. And I wouldn't have. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Note: mail deliv