Here's a fix. Sorry, I didn't realize it was ever called without a
version number.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> heh that's a nice one the snapshot generation script uses "
> gmake -s VERSION=snapshot dist" and that leads to getting "
> --set-version=snapshot" passed to g
FWIW, the old make rule was
fmgroids.h fmgrtab.c: (deps)
which is now
fmgroids.h: fmgrtab.c ;
fmgrtab.c: (deps)
I was going by this comment in parser/Makefile:
# There is no correct way to write a rule that generates two files.
# Rules with two targets don't have that meaning, they are merel
Tom,
It seems I introduced a couple errors in src/tools/msvc/clean.bat in
the bki patch. I'm attaching a cumulative fix. I can resend the
complete updated patch, if you like...
Sorry! :-)
John
> I'm planning to go look at Naylor's bki refactoring patch now. Assuming
> there isn't any showstoppe
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>> > On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
>> >> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later
Here's a patch:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
index 6750db8..1276c39 100644
*** a/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
*** if (!triggered)
*** 2018,2024
!Data Definition Language (DML) - INSERT,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it
> pretty interesting. The technology choices make it
> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules
> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and
Hello everyone,
I was quite intrigued by a discussion that happened this past summer
regarding generation of bootstrap files such as postgres.bki, and the
associated pain points of maintaining the DATA() statements in catalog headers.
It occurred to me that the current system is backwards: Instead
(resent to -hackers)
I just applied and tested the new patch. Everything works great.
The only thing I would change now is some of the comments.
1). On line 289, one of the regression test comments got copied:
+ move forward in c; --should be at '5'
change to:
+ move forwar
