Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where
this patch ended up.
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmobrrrxco+t6gcqrw_djw+uf9zedwf9bejnu+rb5teb...@mail.gmail.com)
I'm
trying to experiment with some new hardware - and the functionality to
add specific
Bruce Momjian wrote:
No, it isn't. Please add a TODO item about it:
* Prevent long-lived temp tables from causing frozen-Xid advancement
starvation
Can somebody explain this one to me? because of our auditing technique,
we have many LONG lived temp tables.(one per pooled
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really? Wow, *that's* an interesting thought. Is it likely that that
temp table could contain many-hour-old data?
Certainly...our connection pool used by jboss can have connections to postgres
persisting for multiple days. (We're still looking for a way to
