ng “Project -> C/C++ Index ->
Rebuild” (I think).
--
Jason Petersen
Software Engineer | Citus Data
303.736.9255
ja...@citusdata.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
to-SQL function would be a huge improvement
for now.
I trawled through the archives but couldn’t find any discussion of why this
function was kept static.
--
Jason Petersen
Software Engineer | Citus Data
303.736.9255
ja...@citusdata.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Within the core codebase, BuildTupleFromCStrings is often called within a temporary memory context cleared after the call. In dblink.c, this is justified as being needed to “[clean up] not only the data we have direct access to, but any cruft the I/O functions might leak”.I wrote a pretty minimal c
I've been deep in the FDW APIs lately and have come up with a couple of
questions about the [user-facing documentation][1].
# Requirement that DELETE use junk columns
The bit I'm confused by is the parenthetical in this bit at the end of the
section on `AddForeignUpdateTargets`:
> If the AddFore
On Apr 18, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Counting clock sweeps is an intersting idea. I think one concern was
> tracking hot buffers in cases where there is no memory pressure, and
> hence the clock sweep isn't running --- I am not sure how this would
> help in that case.
>
Yes, we o
In December, Metin (a coworker of mine) discussed an inability to scale a
simple task (parallel scans of many independent tables) to many cores (it’s
here). As a ramp-up task at Citus I was tasked to figure out what the heck was
going on here.
I have a pretty extensive writeup here (whose lengt
Bump.
I’m interested in many of the issues that were discussed in this thread. Was
this patch ever wrapped up (I can’t find it in any CF), or did this thread die
off?
—Jason
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Friday, June 28, 2013 6:20 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2
I realize Postgres’ codebase is probably intractably large to begin using a
tool like splint (http://www.splint.org ), but this is exactly the sort of
thing it’ll catch. I’m pretty sure it would have warned in this case that the
code relies on an ordering of side effects that is left undefined b
