Am 07.11.2013 12:42, schrieb Dilip kumar:
> This patch
implementing the following TODO item
>
> Allow parallel cores to be
used by vacuumdb
>
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f10a728.7090...@agliodbs.com [1]
>
> Like Parallel pg_dump, vacuumdb is provided with the option to run
th
Am 07.11.2013 19:08, schrieb Joshua D. Drake:>
> On 11/07/2013 10:00 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> If we wanted to change the defaults, I think it would be easier to
>> create a separate bin name (e.g. pg_backup) than to change the existing
>> parameters for pg_dump.
>
> I am not opposed to that. Allo
Am 23.02.2012 21:57, schrieb Greg Smith:
On 02/22/2012 05:31 PM, james wrote:
Has anyone considered managing a system like the DragonFLY swapcache for
a DBMS like PostgreSQL?
ie where the admin can assign drives with good random read behaviour
(but perhaps also-ran random write) such as SSDs to
Am 13.01.2012 22:50, schrieb Josh Berkus:
It occurs to me that I would find it quite personally useful if the
vacuumdb utility was multiprocess capable.
For example, just today I needed to manually analyze a database with
over 500 tables, on a server with 24 cores. And I needed to know when
th
I have not tried the patch (yet), but Informix'sl dbacess would do about
the same - and it's something I really missed.
Jan
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to y
